|

A ‘Night of Firsts’
By Bari Auerbach
The first Sunny Isles Beach City Commission meeting held in the new first-class
Government Center building on Feb. 10 reflected the goal of elected officials
to “put the people first” when making decisions on issues affecting
quality of life and continued progress.
On behalf of the
City Commission, Mayor Norman Edelcup greeted all in attendance and
announced the meeting
was being held in the future site
of a Miami-Dade public library branch on the first level of Government
Center pending completion of Commission Chambers named after the city’s
first mayor David Samson.
‘First
rate job’
The first item on the meeting agenda was a special presentation by the
Sunny Isles Beach Citizens’ Coalition to the City Commission.
Coalition president Henry Kay explained, “We are presenting a
plaque to Mayor Norman Edelcup expressing great appreciation and joy
to have someone we can trust to do his best for the well-being and
quality of life of the citizens of Sunny Isles Beach…This appreciation
extends to the whole Commission.”
Accepting the plaque, Edelcup noted, “This is a wonderful honor
to accept on behalf of the Commission…I believe all of us are dedicated
to a good form of government and we have the public’s interest
at heart at all times whenever we’re making any decisions. I believe
we all try to put the public first - and I believe in time we will have
an even greater city than we have today due to the hard work of the Commission,
city staff and residents who come and give us their insight into the
items we’re discussing.”
‘First
SIB condo by Carlos Ott’
On Feb. 10, plans for one of the first Sunny Isles Beach luxury condominiums
designed by internationally renowned architect Carlos Ott were approved
by the City Commission for the property located at 17121 Collins Avenue.
Speaking on behalf of Jade developer Fortune Ocean LLP, attorney Judith
Burke explained, “We are requesting site plan approval for a
luxury residential condo on approximately 300 feet of frontage on Collins
just north of 170th Street – Jade Beach II is adjacent to or
just north of Fortune’s first project [Jade Beach I} which will
hopefully break ground in about two weeks [from Feb. 10].”
Burke went on to
note Jade Beach II contains approximately 560,000 square feet of space
and 49
stories designed to complement rather than mirror
the “spectacular” Jade Beach I also designed by Carlos Ott.
“The project requests to utilize 129,216 square feet of TDR’s
(transfers of development rights) that come from a sender site already
approved by this Commission transferred from the Casino property into
city’s TDR bank,” Burke said. “This unique project
meets all regulations of the city’s land development regulations
and not a single variance is being requested. Further, the project uses
all of the bonuses available under the city’s regulations including
dedication of an oceanfront park and the provision of a beach access
easement that is 20 feet in width rather than just the 15 feet required.”
According to Ott,
the “new and unique” Jade
II tower with a nautical motif will have curved elevations and be fully
clad in glass,
featuring huge waterfalls cascading down the podium facing Collins Avenue.
Recommending site
plan approval, zoning director Jorge Vera reported, “This
is a 256 unit condo building…They’re asking for 59 dwelling
units and 129,217 square feet of Floor Area Ration with TDR’s…Staff
has no objections – they have met all requirements.”
Prior to voting unanimously
to approve the Jade II site plan, Commission members made recommendations
including increasing the number of handicap
parking spaces; and avoiding “early morning construction starts.” Mayor
Edelcup also asked if the developer would consider a donation supporting
the city’s goal to promote art in pubic or private places.
Ordinances for first reading
On Feb. 10, the City Commission passed an ordinance on first reading
relating to parking regulations that will prohibit parking of vehicles
on front lawns in residential districts and on publicly maintained
lawns in landscaped areas.
“In residential districts, no vehicle shall be permitted to park
on the front or side lawns on any property,” zoning director Jorge
Vera explained. “We’ve also placed in the ordinance that
the ordinance shall not apply to special events involving family or social
gathering provided such events do not occur more than once a week; and
we went from penalty of $25 to $250.”
Commissioner Danny
Iglesias, an engineer with the Florida Department of Transportation,
noted, “The idea of the ordinance is to promote
green space…One of the policies we adopted at FDOT that has been
very well received is supporting tree preservation by encouraging the
transplant of trees whenever feasible and cost effective. [If the transfer
is from private to public property], the City Manager and Commission
[would have to approve of the tree transfer].” Subsequently, City
Attorney Lynn Dannheisser recommended drafting a separate ordinance pertaining
to the tree transfer concept that could be applicable to commercial and
residential properties.
Pointing out that
residents have already curtailed parking on lawns, Vice Mayor Lewis
Thaler said, “I took a ride through [Golden Shores]
and I have to say there has been a tremendous improvement even though
the ordinance hasn’t passed yet.”
During public commentary,
Golden Shores resident Mary Wynne inquired about parking on gravel
in lieu of the “hard surface” dictated
by the ordinance. In response, building official Clay Parker said, “Grass
can grow back up through the gravel…I think a hard paved surface
would be appropriate.”
Ethics: A first priority
On Feb. 10, the Commission amended the city’s ethics code to require
disclosure of any gift having a value in excess of $100 in keeping with
a decision by Miami-Dade County to raise the gift disclosure from $25
to $100.
The Commission also approved an ordinance on first reading implementing
provisions of Florida statutes to establish a procedure governing ex-parte
communications with local public officials concerning quasi-judicial
matters. Generally, ex parte communication can be defined as “oral
or written, off-the record communication made to or by commissioners
without notice to parties directed to the merits or outcome of an on-the-record
proceeding.”
City Attorney Lynn Dannheisser explained, “This ordinance provides
a procedure by which an inadvertent ex-parte communication can be disclosed
at the public hearing. It also provides a process for that public hearing
and will shield both the Commission and public who may make such an inadvertent
communication from having the application if approved from being overturned.”
Mayor Norman Edelcup
added. “We’re talking about having
our ex-parte ordinance changed strictly for zoning matters that come
before us when we act in a quasi-judicial hearing…It’s only
on zoning matters that we are prohibited from speaking with any party
whether it be the builder, developer our next door neighbor anyone in
the city because we’re acting in the position for zoning as judges…As
judges, we can only take testimony before the public so if anyone on
the street might come up to us to discuss a zoning project, we have to
say, ‘No, you can’t talk to us about it until there is a
public hearing.’
“[By amending this ordinance] we’re providing for the event
that if somebody started to talk to us in the public about a particular
zoning project, we would attempt to close that meeting, but if in fact
an exchange took place – [the amended ordinance] requires us to
disclose the fact that an exchange took place and it gives opposing sides
to an issue the opportunity to cross examine the people who were involved.”
First Amendment questions
On Feb. 10, attorneys Stanley Price and Cliff Schulman, who represent
Sunny Isles Beach developers, expressed first amendment right concerns
regarding an “art in public places” ordinance adopted by
the city.
The ordinance, passed
on first reading at a Jan. 13 City Commission meeting, may require
the placement
of artwork on public property as part
of site plan approval. Providing clarification, Mayor Norman Edelcup
noted, “In order to increase the quality of life in our city, we’re
proposing this ordinance to make it mandatory for large projects [to
enhance the city with art in public places]. Heretofore, this was a ‘voluntary’ situation
relating to works of art – and now [it will be] a mandatory situation
where [art] can either be placed in front of the development or [the
developer can] contribute to the city for [the creation of] art in public
places.”
City Attorney Lynn
Dannheisser explained, “This ordinance regarding
placement of works of art on private property promotes and encourages
the integration of art into the architecture of the city under the zoning
ordinance…If the applicant is unable or chooses not to construct
the work of art, the applicant shall pay a fee into the public art trust
fund.
“’
Art’ is defined in this ordinance as any work of visual art that
is an integral part of the structure, attached to a structure or detached
from the structure - or outside of it. The ordinance encourages developers
to construct the work of art through a cost allocation provision…[meaning]
if the developer constructs the work of art as part of the project,
he or she is required to contribute one percent of the estimated construction
cost up to $500,000 for the work of art.
“Conversely, if the developer chooses not to construct in front
of his project, he or she will be required to pay that amount - and/or
he or she can choose to construct a work of art…We’re not
requiring more than $500,000 be dedicated even though it’s one
percent of construction costs.”
According to Price,
the ordinance has “First Amendment implications.” He
noted, “You can’t dictate what someone wants to do with their
private property…You’re telling [developers] unless they
do this they’re not going to get an approval…this is an illegal
exaction…There is no limit [set in the ordinance] for offsite [art
donation] as there is for onsite…I think with this ordinance you’re
barking up a constitutional disaster.”
Schulman concurred
with Price stating, “[The Commission] is making
it more expensive to build in the city every day…[If the ordinance
passes] you will be unique in requiring a developer not only to build
all the infrastructure you want - but then to give you anywhere from
between half a million and two million dollars for what you consider
to be art…A building [like the Jade I and II towers designed by
Carlos Ott] can be a work of art itself…What you’re asking
a developer to give you is well intended but discriminatory only for
the “rich developers” and not for townhomes or single family
homes.”
In response, Deputy
City Attorney Hans Ottinot explained that per his research, “Nine
other cities have adopted a similar ordinance requiring developers
to pay a fee
or construct a work of art on their property.”
Ultimately, the Commission agreed to approve the ordinance on second
reading with a provision setting a cost cap of up to $500,000 if the
art is constructed as part of a project or if a contribution is made
to place the art elsewhere in the city. It was also decided the ordinance
would not apply to projects that have already received site plan approval.
First public school progress
In keeping with efforts to acquire property to build a public school
in Sunny Isles Beach, the Commission has been researching eminent domain
proceedings. On Feb. 10, City Attorney Lynn Dannheisser reported, “We
requested an Attorney General opinion as to whether the School Board
could initiate the condemnation action for the property we want to
acquire for the school site…We asked whether the School Board
could initiate a condemnation action on our behalf so we could acquire
the property for an educational purpose…We were going to pay
for all the costs including the acquisition and in turn, the [School
Board] would turn the title over to us and we would lease the property
back for them to construct a school.
“The [Attorney General] opined the School Board may not use its
power of eminent domain on behalf of the city and subsequently convey
the title to the city even if a lease hold interest is granted back to
the School Board. As such, this leaves us with a couple of options…The
City Manager and I met with Ron Book to discuss reinstating a provision
that took away our power of eminent domain to acquire property for a
public school.
“We should [soon] know if we can condemn the property on our own
or [if] the School Board can do the acquisition and construction…Once
we have the answers, the Mayor will bring options back to the School
Advisory Committee…We’ll wait to have further discussions
until we get that opinion and will continue to try to acquire the site
through negotiations.”
Putting patriotism first
Senior citizen activist Stanley Shapiro addressed the Commission on Feb.
10 requesting that the city donate $1,000 to an initiative dedicated
to sending letters to service men and women overseas conceived by the
non-profit organization Primetime Seniors. According to Shapiro, other
cities including North Bay Village, Surfside, Bal Harbour and Bay Harbor
have already or will be joining in contributing to the endeavor as
well. Following Shapiro’s presentation, the Sunny Isles Beach
City Commission unanimously voted to make the $1,000 donation.
TOP
|